[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180410071432.GA5093@yuvallap>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:14:32 +0300
From: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
keescook@...omium.org, pombredanne@...b.com, bp@...e.de,
abbotti@....co.uk, rdunlap@...radead.org, bhe@...hat.com,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do { \
> > * your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
> > * allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
> > *
> > - * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
> > + * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
> > * argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
> > * The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
> > * using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?
>
> Please also fix the typo in the title ;-)
Sorry, fixed that but forgot to amend :)
Will post v2 in few seconds.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists