linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: Switch to a fixed upper bound for registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:08:56 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: Switch to a fixed upper bound for registers

Hi Laura,

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven pointed out that the number of register was a
> fixed upper bound so there's no need to use a dynamically allocated
> array in place of a VLA. Use the defined upper bound.
>
> Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>

Thanks for your patch!

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds