[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180410090917.GZ21835@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:09:17 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, mguzik@...hat.com,
gorcunov@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and
env_start|end in mm_struct
On Tue 10-04-18 05:52:54, Yang Shi wrote:
[...]
> So, introduce a new spinlock in mm_struct to protect the concurrent
> access to arg_start|end, env_start|end and others except start_brk and
> brk, which are still protected by mmap_sem to avoid concurrent access
> from do_brk().
Is there any fundamental problem with brk using the same lock?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists