lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1523357615.2753.188.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:53:35 +0300
From:   Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tools/power turbostat: if --max_loop, print for
 specific time of loops

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 12:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> wrote:
> > From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> > 
> > There's a use case during test to only print specific round of
> > loops
> > if --interval is specified, for example, with this patch applied:
> > 
> > turbostat -i 5 --max_loops 4
> > will capture 4 samples with 5 seconds interval.
> 
> Why --max_loops and not just --loops or --iterations?

Or just --count.

Artem.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ