[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180410121949.GA29464@yu-chen.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:19:49 +0800
From: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tools/power turbostat: if --max_loop, print for
specific time of loops
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> > From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> >
> > There's a use case during test to only print specific round of loops
> > if --interval is specified, for example, with this patch applied:
> >
> > turbostat -i 5 --max_loops 4
> > will capture 4 samples with 5 seconds interval.
>
> Why --max_loops and not just --loops or --iterations?
>
I thought -l has been used already. OK, changed to --interation and
-t respectively.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists