[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523365446-31563-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:04:06 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: kishon@...com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, nsekhar@...com,
john@...anate.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pci: endpoint: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in pci_epf_test_write
pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
[1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
in pci_epf_test_probe().
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
* wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
* error in observed in the host system.
*/
- mdelay(1);
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
kfree(buf);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists