[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR2101MB10325D85829E62CD43128227FBBE0@DM5PR2101MB1032.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:49:22 +0000
From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg loop
from locking slowpath
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 32.4825)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
Unable to calculate
v4.15.16: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
Unable to calculate
v4.14.33: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
Unable to calculate
v4.9.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
Unable to calculate
v4.4.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1c4941fd53af ("locking/pvqspinlock: Allow limited lock stealing")
1f03e8d29192 ("locking/barriers: Replace smp_cond_acquire() with smp_cond_load_acquire()")
64d816cba06c ("locking/qspinlock: Use _acquire/_release() versions of cmpxchg() & xchg()")
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists