[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR2101MB10326066D3508A2D9892B508FBBE0@DM5PR2101MB1032.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:50:23 +0000
From: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
CC: "npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: safer lock nesting
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 44.5575)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33, v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
v4.16.1: Build OK!
v4.15.16: Build OK!
v4.14.33: Build OK!
v4.9.93: Build OK!
v4.4.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
62cccb8c8e7a ("mm: simplify lock_page_memcg()")
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists