[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29ab4b56-f857-a2d6-0b28-833896e9f47c@axentia.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:42:08 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove me as maintainer for I2C host drivers
On 2018-04-10 17:52, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> Hmm, I think you are ducking out from the i2c-mux-pinctrl driver as well.
>> Was that the intent?
>
> Oops, nope! Sorry, I just forgot about the demux (I think you mean that
> one) driver and will create a seperate entry for it.
Right, I meant the demux...
>>
>>> +I2C SUBSYSTEM DRIVERS
>>> +L: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>>> +W: https://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
>>> +Q: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/
>>> +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git
>>> +S: Odd Fixes
>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/
>>> +F: drivers/i2c/*/
>>> +
>>
>> And this includes all the other muxes, i.e. those that are "mine". Maybe
>> not a problem, but what do I know?
>
> Sorry again, I really didn't want to dump something on you or leave you
> all alone with the muxes. I was just so focussed on the host drivers
> that muxes simply slipped through my mind :( I can add myself to the
> muxes section again, no problem. I'll let you decidei what you prefer,
> both is fine for me. You are doing a great job there!
No no, you don't need to add yourself there. I understand the mux drivers,
and it's pretty quiet, so no need for that. What I was worrying about was
this "Odd Fixes" fallback entry needlessly covering the muxes when they
are covered elsewhere.
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists