linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77970: add LVDS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f54ba77-368f-3d0c-cb58-4849672af449@cogentembedded.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:12:36 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>, horms@...ge.net.au,
        magnus.damm@...il.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, niklas.soderlund@...natech.se,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77970: add LVDS support

On 04/10/2018 03:13 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:

>>> From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
>>>
>>> Add the LVDS device to r8a77970.dtsi in a disabled state. Also connect
>>> the it to the LVDS output of the DU.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> - Rebased on the modified endpoint name and changed patch subject to
>>>   comply with other patches in the series from Sergei.
>>
>>    Stop, what was wrong with my R8A77970 LVDS patch, reposted on the popular
>> demand? :-)
>>
> 
> Nothing wrong, I found out about your right now.
> I see a very small difference as
>          lvds@...90000 vs lvds-encoder@...90000

   Yes, I thought the latter was closer to a "generic" name that DT spec requires...

> You can add your signed-off-by ofc if you think that's the case.

   Didn't understand what you mean here...

> Thanks
>    j

MBR, Sergei