linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/2] Documentation: Documentation for qcom, llcc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1523390893-10904-2-git-send-email-rishabhb@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:08:12 -0700
From:   Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, kyan@...eaurora.org, ckadabi@...eaurora.org,
        stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] Documentation: Documentation for qcom, llcc

Documentation for last level cache controller device tree bindings,
client bindings usage examples.

Signed-off-by: Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt      | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..497cf0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+== Introduction==
+
+LLCC (Last Level Cache Controller) provides last level of cache memory in SOC,
+that can be shared by multiple clients. Clients here are different cores in the
+SOC, the idea is to minimize the local caches at the clients and migrate to
+common pool of memory
+
+Properties:
+- compatible:
+	 Usage: required
+	 Value type: <string>
+	 Definition: must be "qcom,sdm845-llcc"
+
+- reg:
+	 Usage: required
+	 Value Type: <prop-encoded-array>
+	 Definition: must be addresses and sizes of the LLCC registers
+
+- #cache-cells:
+	 Usage: required
+	 Value Type: <u32>
+	 Definition: Number of cache cells, must be 1
+
+- max-slices:
+	 usage: required
+	 Value Type: <u32>
+	 Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware
+
+Example:
+
+	llcc: qcom,llcc@...0000 {
+		compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc";
+		reg = <0x1100000 0x250000>;
+		#cache-cells = <1>;
+		max-slices = <32>;
+	};
+
+== Client ==
+
+Properties:
+- cache-slice-names:
+	 Usage: required
+	 Value type: <stringlist>
+	 Definition: A set of names that identify the usecase names of a
+			client that uses cache slice. These strings are
+			used to look up the cache slice entries by name.
+
+- cache-slices:
+	 Usage: required
+	 Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+	 Definition: The tuple has phandle to llcc device as the first
+			argument and the second argument is the usecase
+			id of the client.
+For Example:
+	venus {
+		cache-slice-names = "vidsc0", "vidsc1";
+	 	cache-slices = <&llcc VIDSC0_ID>, <&llcc VIDSC1_ID>;
+	};
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project