linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 239/310] sparc64: ldc abort during vds iso boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180411183632.768848978@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:36:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jagannathan Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>,
        Aaron Young <aaron.young@...cle.com>,
        Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
        Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@...cle.com>,
        Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 239/310] sparc64: ldc abort during vds iso boot

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jag Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>


[ Upstream commit 6c95483b768c62f8ee933ae08a1bdbcb78b5410f ]

Orabug: 20902628

When an ldc control-only packet is received during data exchange in
read_nonraw(), a new rx head is calculated but the rx queue head is not
actually advanced (rx_set_head() is not called) and a branch is taken to
'no_data' at which point two things can happen depending on the value
of the newly calculated rx head and the current rx tail:

- If the rx queue is determined to be not empty, then the wrong packet
  is picked up.

- If the rx queue is determined to be empty, then a read error (EAGAIN)
  is eventually returned since it is falsely assumed that more data was
  expected.

The fix is to update the rx head and return in case of a control only
packet during data exchange.

Signed-off-by: Jagannathan Raman <jag.raman@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Young <aaron.young@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -1733,9 +1733,14 @@ static int read_nonraw(struct ldc_channe
 
 		lp->rcv_nxt = p->seqid;
 
+		/*
+		 * If this is a control-only packet, there is nothing
+		 * else to do but advance the rx queue since the packet
+		 * was already processed above.
+		 */
 		if (!(p->type & LDC_DATA)) {
 			new = rx_advance(lp, new);
-			goto no_data;
+			break;
 		}
 		if (p->stype & (LDC_ACK | LDC_NACK)) {
 			err = data_ack_nack(lp, p);