linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 306/310] vhost_net: add missing lock nesting notation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180411183635.706806905@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:37:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+7f073540b1384a614e09@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 306/310] vhost_net: add missing lock nesting notation

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>


[ Upstream commit aaa3149bbee9ba9b4e6f0bd6e3e7d191edeae942 ]

We try to hold TX virtqueue mutex in vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len()
after RX virtqueue mutex is held in handle_rx(). This requires an
appropriate lock nesting notation to calm down deadlock detector.

Fixes: 0308813724606 ("vhost_net: basic polling support")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f073540b1384a614e09@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/net.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(st
 
 	if (!len && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
 		/* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
-		mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+		mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, 1);
 		vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
 
 		preempt_disable();
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *
 	struct iov_iter fixup;
 	__virtio16 num_buffers;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+	mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, 0);
 	sock = vq->private_data;
 	if (!sock)
 		goto out;