[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411003553.jtmydjialbbgb6hx@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:35:53 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [bisect done] e71e836f46 [ 17.567570] WARNING: CPU:
0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:540 __change_page_attr_set_clr
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:59:21PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>On 04/09/2018 06:12 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
>> | | 64c8075940 | e71e836f46 | 0564258fb2 | 87e1e2f51c |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
>> | boot_successes | 35 | 0 | 19 | 11 |
>> | boot_failures | 0 | 26 | | |
>> | WARNING:at_arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:#__change_page_attr_set_clr | 0 | 26 | | |
>> | RIP:__change_page_attr_set_clr | 0 | 26 | | |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
>
>LKP folks, does this mean that the system didn't boot in all the places
>that we saw this warning? Or does this just say that it *had* the
>warning 26 times?
The 'e71e836f46' column means there are 0 boots (sorry boot_successes
might be a bit confusing) with clean dmesg and 26 boots with
warning/error dmesg. It indicates that WARNING is 100% reproducible.
boot_successes + boot_failures = total test boots
>I looked into this a bit. This LKP report points the finger at this
>commit which trips over a new debugging WARN_ON() I added:
>
>[patch 06/11] x86/mm: Remove extra filtering in pageattr code
>
>It's because set_memory_nx() encounters the (unsupported) _PAGE_GLOBAL
>bit while clearing _PAGE_NX. I never saw this in testing because this
>patch:
>
>[PATCH 10/11] x86/pti: never implicitly clear _PAGE_GLOBAL for kernel image
>
>explicitly clears out _PAGE_GLOBAL long before the set_memory_nx() call.
>So I *think* this is a transient issue resulting in bad ordering of the
>_PAGE_GLOBAL patch set. I believe it is harmless.
Right. The '0564258fb2' and '87e1e2f51c' columns mean the
'tip/x86/pti' and 'tip/master' branch HEADs boot clean.
So it's a transient warning inside the branch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists