[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a379d97-81f8-945a-abfc-af62da076c5a@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:22:07 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bpf: handling non BPF register names in inline assembly with
-target bpf
On 4/11/18 4:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:47:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0700, Yonghong Song escreveu:
>>> Look at test bpf-script-test-kbuild.c, I think you can drop
>>> uapi/asm/ptrace.h from include file list. This way, you do not need
>>> __BPF__ in x86/include/asm/asm.h. At the same time, you can
>>> remove __BPF__ as well.
>>
>> That's even better, I'll try that approach, that code was done by
>> someone else, so I ended up not considering looking if removing a
>> unnecessary header would fix the issue, I'll check and if that works
>> I'll revert the patch that introduced that ifndef __BPF__.
>
> So this is what I've pushed to my perf/core branch:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/acme/c/707ba03243d2 (HEAD -> perf/core) Revert "x86/asm: Allow again using asm.h when building for the 'bpf' clang target"
> https://git.kernel.org/acme/c/4364203f5563 pref tests bpf: Remove unused ptrace.h include from LLVM test
Looks good. Thank you!
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists