[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h4lkib3rd.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:28:54 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Fix unexpected swiotlb_alloc_coherent() failures
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:10:20 +0200,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:50:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > In the first one, the machine appears to have enough RAM that most of it is
> > beyond the device's 36-bit DMA mask, thus it's fairly likely for the
> > initial direct alloc to come back with something unsuitable.
>
> But we should try a GFP_DMA32 allocation first, so this is a bit
> surprising.
Hm, do we really try that?
Through a quick glance, dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags() gives GFP_DMA32
only when coherent mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32); in the case of iwlwifi,
it's 36bit, so GFP_DMA isn't set.
We had a fallback allocation with GFP_DMA32 in the past, but this
seems gone long time ago along with cleanups (commit c647c3bb2d16).
But I haven't followed about this topic for long time, so I might have
missed obviously...
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists