lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411080413.GC2137@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:04:13 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+6304bf97ef436580fede@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 134/138] vhost: validate log when IOTLB is enabled

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:55:53PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 02:33:16 +0300
> 
> > That's a bug, davem just queued a patch to fix this upstream.
> 
> It did not get queued up.
> 
> The patch series didn't apply so I asked the submitter to
> respin and resubmit:
> 
> 	https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=152337186209819&w=2

So should I drop this until a fix comes in?  Or keep it for now?
I have no objection to staying "bug compatible" with Linus's tree :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ