[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523435416-4256-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:30:16 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: airlied@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpu: drm: ast: Replace mdelay with msleep in ast_post_chip_2500
ast_post_chip_2500() is never called in atomic context.
The call chains ending up at reset_mmc_2500() are:
[1] ast_post_chip_2500() <- ast_post_gpu() <- ast_drm_thaw()
[2] ast_post_chip_2500() <- ast_post_gpu() <- ast_driver_load()
ast_drm_thaw() calls console_lock() which can sleep.
ast_driver_load() is set as ".load" in struct drm_driver.
These functions are not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, ast_post_chip_2500()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with msleep() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_post.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_post.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_post.c
index f7d4213..67c5e50 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_post.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_post.c
@@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@ void ast_post_chip_2500(struct drm_device *dev)
temp = ast_mindwm(ast, 0x1e6e2070);
if (temp & 0x00800000) {
ast_moutdwm(ast, 0x1e6e207c, 0x00800000);
- mdelay(100);
+ msleep(100);
ast_moutdwm(ast, 0x1e6e2070, 0x00800000);
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists