[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7558e956-62bd-39b9-6ff1-4d5f7ee2c9a3@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:33:59 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
frankt@...mise.com, andre@...ux-ide.org
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ide: pdc202xx_new: Replace mdelay with usleep_range
in detect_pll_input_clock
Hello!
On 4/11/2018 10:52 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> detect_pll_input_clock() is never called in atomic context.
>
> detect_pll_input_clock() is only called by init_chipset_pdcnew(), which
> is set as ".init_chipset" in struct ide_port_info.
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, detect_pll_input_clock()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
> index b33646b..6afa66d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long detect_pll_input_clock(unsigned long dma_base)
> outb(scr1 | 0x40, dma_base + 0x03);
>
> /* Let the counter run for 10 ms. */
> - mdelay(10);
> + usleep_range(10);
This function takes 2 arguments.
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists