lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:17:04 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@....com>, sulrich@...eaurora.org,
        "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Emily Deng <Emily.Deng@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        timur@...eaurora.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        David Panariti <David.Panariti@....com>,
        Jim Qu <Jim.Qu@....com>, Roger He <Hongbo.He@....com>,
        Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@....com>, Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/amdgpu: limit DMA size to PAGE_SIZE for
 scatter-gather buffers

Am 11.04.2018 um 08:26 schrieb Huang Rui:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:59:55PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Code is expecing to observe the same number of buffers returned from
>> dma_map_sg() function compared to sg_alloc_table_from_pages(). This
>> doesn't hold true universally especially for systems with IOMMU.
>>
>> IOMMU driver tries to combine buffers into a single DMA address as much
>> as it can. The right thing is to tell the DMA layer how much combining
>> IOMMU can do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> Sinan, I guess Christian's suggestion is to add amdgpu_device_init function
> like here:

Yes, exactly. Looks like Sinan just tried to place the call next to 
pci_set_dma_mask()/pci_set_consistent_dma_mask().

Not necessary a bad idea, but in this case not optimal.

Sinan please refine your patch as Rui suggested and resend.

Thanks,
Christian.

>
> 8<-------
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 0e798b3..9b96771 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -2339,6 +2339,8 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>          /* init the mode config */
>          drm_mode_config_init(adev->ddev);
>
> +       dma_set_max_seg_size(adev->dev, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>          r = amdgpu_device_ip_init(adev);
>          if (r) {
>                  /* failed in exclusive mode due to timeout */
> 8<-------
>
> After that, we don't do it in each generation.
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ