linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] x86/PCI: Make pci=earlydump output neat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180411094711.GH2173@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:47:11 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/PCI: Make pci=earlydump output neat

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:11:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Currently the early dump of PCI configuration space looks quite unhelpful, e.g.
> 
> [    0.000000]   60:
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]  00
> [    0.000000]
> 
> which makes really hard to get anything out of this. Convert the function to
> use print_hex_dump() to make output neat.
> 
> In the result we will have
> 
> [    0.000000] 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> which is much, much better.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/early.c | 19 +++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/early.c b/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> index f0114007e915..53a87692d687 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> @@ -59,24 +59,15 @@ int early_pci_allowed(void)
>  
>  void early_dump_pci_device(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func)
>  {
> +	u32 value[256 / 4];
>  	int i;
> -	int j;
> -	u32 val;
>  
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "pci 0000:%02x:%02x.%d config space:",
> -	       bus, slot, func);
> +	pr_info("pci 0000:%02x:%02x.%d config space:\n", bus, slot, func);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < 256; i += 4) {
> -		if (!(i & 0x0f))
> -			printk("\n  %02x:",i);
> +	for (i = 0; i < 256; i += 4)
> +		value[i/4] = read_pci_config(bus, slot, func, i);

Please be consistent with your use of whitespace: 256 / 4 vs. i/4.

Other than that looks good and certainly is an improvement,

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>