[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <390fac56-8656-ebbb-5405-0a44f1773157@axentia.se>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:56:24 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] eeprom: at24: don't assign the i2c ID table to
at24_driver
On 2018-04-10 15:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We switched to using probe_new(), so this is no longer used
> by i2c core.
It seems to be used in i2c_device_match() ???
This could easily be me not understanding something...
Cheers,
Peter
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 0c125f207aea..2310f26ac4f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver at24_driver = {
> },
> .probe_new = at24_probe,
> .remove = at24_remove,
> - .id_table = at24_ids,
> };
>
> static int __init at24_init(void)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists