linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup, document and fix iowait boost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:58:28 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq/schedutil: Cleanup, document and fix iowait
 boost

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > - sugov_set_iowait_boost: is now in charge only to set/increase the IO
> > >      wait boost, every time a task wakes up from an IO wait.
> > > 
> > > - sugov_iowait_boost: is now in charge to reset/reduce the IO wait
> > >      boost, every time a sugov update is triggered, as well as
> > >      to (eventually) enforce the currently required IO boost value.
> > 
> > I'm not sold on those function names; feels like we can do better,
> > although I'm struggling to come up with anything sensible just now.
> 
> What about something like:
> 
>  sugov_iowait_init()
>  since here we are mainly initializing the iowait boost
> 
>  sugov_iowait_boost()
>  since here we are mainly applying the proper boost to each cpu
> 
> Although they are not really so different...

How about:

  sugov_iowait_boost() -- does the actual impulse/boost
  sugov_iowait_apply() -- applies the boost state

?