linux-kernel - [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 08/20] lockdep: Make _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180411135110.9217-9-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:50:58 +0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 08/20] lockdep: Make __bfs(.match) return bool

The "match" parameter of __bfs() is used for checking whether we hit a
match in the search, therefore it should return a boolean value rather
than an integer for better readability.

This patch then changes the return type of the function parameter and the
match functions to bool.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 53ce81e8a6a9..df1637db923a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ static inline void bfs_init_root(struct lock_list *lock,
  */
 static enum bfs_result __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 			     void *data,
-			     int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
+			     bool (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
 			     struct lock_list **target_entry,
 			     int forward)
 {
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static enum bfs_result __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 static inline enum bfs_result
 __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 	       void *data,
-	       int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
+	       bool (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
 	       struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 1);
@@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 static inline enum bfs_result
 __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 		void *data,
-		int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
+		bool (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
 		struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 0);
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int class_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
+static inline bool class_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
 {
 	return entry->class == data;
 }
@@ -1392,10 +1392,10 @@ static noinline int print_bfs_bug(int ret)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int noop_count(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
+static bool noop_count(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
 {
 	(*(unsigned long *)data)++;
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 
 static unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target,
  * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency.
  */
 
-static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
+static inline bool usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
 {
 	return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit);
 }
-- 
2.16.2