linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 134/138] vhost: validate log when IOTLB is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180411.104448.240595797106804343.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mst@...hat.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+6304bf97ef436580fede@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 134/138] vhost: validate log when IOTLB is enabled

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:25:15 +0300

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:04:13AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:55:53PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 02:33:16 +0300
>> > 
>> > > That's a bug, davem just queued a patch to fix this upstream.
>> > 
>> > It did not get queued up.
>> > 
>> > The patch series didn't apply so I asked the submitter to
>> > respin and resubmit:
>> > 
>> > 	https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=152337186209819&w=2
>> 
>> So should I drop this until a fix comes in?  Or keep it for now?
>> I have no objection to staying "bug compatible" with Linus's tree :)
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> greg k-h
> 
> Fix was just posted.

Yeah let me integrate this and send you a copy Greg.