[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411145316.GJ4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:53:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: schedutil: update only with all info
available
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:28:35PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> is maintained although there are not actual usages so far in mainline
> for this hint... do we really need it?
There were intel_pstate patches that I expected to have shown up
already, and I meant to have a look at sugov, except I got side-tracked
again :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists