[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523461910-6294-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:51:50 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: bh74.an@...sung.com, ks.giri@...sung.com, vipul.pandya@...sung.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: samsung: sxgbe: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in sxgbe_sw_reset
sxgbe_sw_reset() is never called in atomic context.
sxgbe_sw_reset() is only called by sxgbe_drv_probe(), which is
only called by sxgbe_platform_probe().
sxgbe_platform_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct platform_driver.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, sxgbe_sw_reset()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
v2:
* Use usleep_range() to correct usleep() in v1.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
index 89831ad..99cd586 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_main.c
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ static int sxgbe_sw_reset(void __iomem *addr)
if (!(readl(addr + SXGBE_DMA_MODE_REG) &
SXGBE_DMA_SOFT_RESET))
break;
- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);
}
if (retry_count < 0)
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists