[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHH2K0bcehi-OH3AQs-VK7+d4-THOVXARTXik2UxRhZOuDrHTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 03:13:34 +0000
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
Cc: Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com, npiggin@...il.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
heguanjun@...tuan.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: safer lock nesting
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:44 PM Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [This is an automated email]
> >
> > This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
> > to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 44.5575)
> >
> > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16.1, v4.15.16, v4.14.33,
v4.9.93, v4.4.127.
> >
> > v4.16.1: Build OK!
> > v4.15.16: Build OK!
> > v4.14.33: Build OK!
> > v4.9.93: Build OK!
> > v4.4.127: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> > 62cccb8c8e7a ("mm: simplify lock_page_memcg()")
> Hi Sasha,
> I test the memory cgroup in lts v4.4, for this issue, 62cccb8c8e7a ("mm:
> simplify lock_page_memcg()")
> need to adjust and there are several other places that need to be fixed.
> I will make the patch for lts v4.4 if no one did.
I'm testing a 4.4-stable patch right now. ETA is a few hours.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists