[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180411183628.475928545@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:34:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Reported-by: Jason Kridner" <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 140/310] gpio: label descriptors using the device name
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
[ Upstream commit 24e78079bf2250874e33da2e7cfbb6db72d3caf4 ]
Some GPIO lines appear named "?" in the lsgpio dump due to their
requesting drivers not passing a reasonable label.
Most typically this happens if a device tree node just defines
gpios = <...> and not foo-gpios = <...>, the former gets named
"foo" and the latter gets named "?".
However the struct device passed in is always valid so let's
just label the GPIO with dev_name() on the device if no proper
label was passed.
Cc: Reported-by: Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>
Reported-by: Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3231,7 +3231,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get
return desc;
}
- status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id);
+ /* If a connection label was passed use that, else use the device name as label */
+ status = gpiod_request(desc, con_id ? con_id : dev_name(dev));
if (status < 0)
return ERR_PTR(status);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists