[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180412070230.GV7671@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:32:30 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] sched/fair: Create util_fits_capacity()
On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
> is factored out into a separate function.
>
> Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
> out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 0951d1c58d2f..0a76ad2ef022 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6574,6 +6574,11 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> return min_t(unsigned long, util, capacity_orig_of(cpu));
> }
>
> +static inline int util_fits_capacity(unsigned long util, unsigned long capacity)
> +{
> + return capacity * 1024 > util * capacity_margin;
This changes the behavior slightly compared to existing code. If that
wasn't intentional, perhaps you should use >= here.
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Disable WAKE_AFFINE in the case where task @p doesn't fit in the
> * capacity of either the waking CPU @cpu or the previous CPU @prev_cpu.
> @@ -6595,7 +6600,7 @@ static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int prev_cpu)
> /* Bring task utilization in sync with prev_cpu */
> sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
>
> - return min_cap * 1024 < task_util(p) * capacity_margin;
> + return !util_fits_capacity(task_util(p), min_cap);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.11.0
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists