linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a7u8iqvl.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:52:14 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, yuankuiz@...eaurora.org,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions

Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:47:19AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> 
>> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > I still have room in my /dev/null mailbox for pure checkpatch patches.
>> > 
>> > > (ooh, https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384 is working this morning)
>> > 
>> > Yes, we really should not use lkml.org for references. Sadly google
>> > displays it very prominently when you search for something.
>> 
>> lkml.org is nice in emails that have a short expected life time and relevance - 
>> but it probably shouldn't be used for permanent references such as kernel 
>> messages, code comments and Git log entries.
>
> Is there a better or recommended way to reference posts on LKML in commit
> messages? (I do like the idea of linking to previous discussions, results,
> ...)

I like lkml.kernel.org, for example a link to your message would be:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180412093521.GA6427@andrea

BTW, I think it would be a good idea to add a hostname to your
Message-Id.

-- 
Kalle Valo