linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180412120832.GZ4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:08:32 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, yuankuiz@...eaurora.org,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool
 member definitions

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:01:37AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 13:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:35:21AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > > Is there a better or recommended way to reference posts on LKML in commit
> > > messages? (I do like the idea of linking to previous discussions, results,
> > > ...)
> > 
> > Yes:
> > 
> >   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/$MSGID
> > 
> > that has the added benefit that it immediately includes the msg-id, so
> > even if you don't have tubes, you can search for it in your local
> > mailboxes.
> > 
> > Also, since we (kernel.org) control the redirection (currently
> > marc.info) we can always point it to a life archive.
> 
> Message IDs are not useful unless you subscribe and
> keep your emails.

I happen to do so..

> It'd be _much_ nicer if vger.kernel.org stored every email
> it sent and had a search mechanism available rather than
> relying on external systems.

People are looking at that afaik.