[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf6c700d-080f-05f8-373b-62f543fa3cd7@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:24:01 +0800
From: "Libin (Huawei)" <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched: pick and check task if double_lock_balance()
unlock the rq
在 2018/4/12 20:20, Steven Rostedt 写道:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:11:45 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 06:58:53PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
>>> Li Bin (1):
>>> sched/deadline.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock
>>> the rq
>>>
>>> Zhou Chengming (1):
>>> sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the
>>> rq
>>>
>>
>> Much thanks!
>>
>> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> Ingo, please apply.
>
> You can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> but I would still like to see the declaration of next_task before the
> comment, just for style concerns.
Ok, I will resend the patchset v2.
Thanks,
Li Bin
>
> -- Steve
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists