[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aac6870-9159-18ba-0aa8-da227c426f38@axentia.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:29:33 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: afe: unit-converter: add support for adi,lt6106
On 2018-04-11 18:13, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 10:51 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 04/11/2018 05:43 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> On 04/11/2018 09:15 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>> This is a current sense amplifier from Analog Devices.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iio/afe/Kconfig | 3 +-
>>>> drivers/iio/afe/iio-unit-converter.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/afe/Kconfig
>>>> index 642ce4eb12a6..0e10fe8f459a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/afe/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/afe/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ config IIO_UNIT_CONVERTER
>>>> depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> help
>>>> Say yes here to build support for the IIO unit converter
>>>> - that handles voltage dividers and current sense shunts.
>>>> + that handles voltage dividers, current sense shunts and
>>>> + the LT6106 Current Sense Amplifier from Analog Devices.
>>>
>>> Could work better to split these out into separate drivers. Maybe a
>>> iio-shunt-resistor.c that does just voltage->current with the
>>> appropriate scaling. Then make a a separate lt6106.c.
>>
>> I don't think we need a separate driver here. There are tons of circuits
>> that all work the same way and all require the same properties. If we'd add
>> a driver for each of them we'd get buried in boilerplate code.
>>
>
> Fair enough, then it should at least be renamed to something generic
> like current-sense-amplifier, as you said lots of circuits do this, not
> just lt6106s. We will have then have support for:
>
> current-sense-amplifier
> current-sense-shunt
> voltage-divider
For the compatible "current-sense-amplifier", I would advocate the
properties...
sense-resistor-micro-ohms
sense-gain
(or something close to that)
...and not input-resistor-ohms and output-resistor-ohms which are way
more particular to the LT6106.
But as I said in the cover letter, I didn't go with sense-gain since I
thought I would end up with requests for non-integer gains. There is
yet to be a comment on the non-integer gain problem, and before there
is a path forward for that case, I'm reluctant.
> compatibles in this driver called "unit-converter" which is still a
> misnomer IMHO.
I don't remember you having presented your preference, and I think
that goes against the established bike-shedding protocol?
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists