lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180412150306.GB5700@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:03:06 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug]: mtd: onenand: omap2plus: kernel panic with OneNAND on
 OMAP3 (DM3730) device GTA04A5

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [180411 07:05]:
> > Am 10.04.2018 um 22:56 schrieb Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>:
> > Well, that's a shame... However, this code is in production for several
> > months now,
> 
> Well, we could have tested earlier release-candidates...

I've found it's way easier to test Linux next on regular basis
and report the regressions compared to chasing regressions after
the merge window or tagged kernels. By that time you may have
already multiple regressions to deal with which is always fun.

If you have products running with mainline kernel, maybe set up
automated boot testing for core devices to catch regressions
early?

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ