linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/2] slab: __GFP_ZERO is incompatible with a constructor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180412191322.GA21205@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:13:22 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] slab: __GFP_ZERO is incompatible with a constructor

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>

__GFP_ZERO requests that the object be initialised to all-zeroes,
while the purpose of a constructor is to initialise an object to a
particular pattern.  We cannot do both.  Add a warning to catch any
users who mistakenly pass a __GFP_ZERO flag when allocating a slab with
a constructor.

Fixes: d07dbea46405 ("Slab allocators: support __GFP_ZERO in all allocators")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
 mm/slab.c | 2 ++
 mm/slob.c | 4 +++-
 mm/slub.c | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 58c8cecc26ab..aca63d49b270 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2661,6 +2661,7 @@ static struct page *cache_grow_begin(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 				invalid_mask, &invalid_mask, flags, &flags);
 		dump_stack();
 	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cachep->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
 	local_flags = flags & (GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK|GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
 
 	check_irq_off();
@@ -3067,6 +3068,7 @@ static inline void cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 static void *cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 				gfp_t flags, void *objp, unsigned long caller)
 {
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cachep->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
 	if (!objp)
 		return objp;
 	if (cachep->flags & SLAB_POISON) {
diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
index 1a46181b675c..958173fd7c24 100644
--- a/mm/slob.c
+++ b/mm/slob.c
@@ -556,8 +556,10 @@ static void *slob_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *c, gfp_t flags, int node)
 					    flags, node);
 	}
 
-	if (b && c->ctor)
+	if (b && c->ctor) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & __GFP_ZERO);
 		c->ctor(b);
+	}
 
 	kmemleak_alloc_recursive(b, c->size, 1, c->flags, flags);
 	return b;
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index a28488643603..0487d316a665 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2434,6 +2434,8 @@ static inline void *new_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
 	struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = *pc;
 	struct page *page;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(s->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
+
 	freelist = get_partial(s, flags, node, c);
 
 	if (freelist)
-- 
2.16.3