linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rapidio: fix rio_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d77db0b1-2cca-c0f6-987d-32ffb45cb16f@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:44:01 -0400
From:   Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ioan Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@...ia.com>
Cc:     Barry Wood <barry.wood@....com>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
        Frank Kunz <frank.kunz@...ia.com>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rapidio: fix rio_dma_transfer error handling


On 2018-04-12 05:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:06:05 +0200 Ioan Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@...ia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Some of the mport_dma_req structure members were initialized late
>> inside the do_dma_request() function, just before submitting the
>> request to the dma engine. But we have some error branches before
>> that. In case of such an error, the code would return on the error
>> path and trigger the calling of dma_req_free() with a req structure
>> which is not completely initialized. This causes a NULL pointer
>> dereference in dma_req_free().
>>
>> This patch fixes these error branches by making sure that all
>> necessary mport_dma_req structure members are initialized in
>> rio_dma_transfer() immediately after the request structure gets
>> allocated.
> 
> This sounds like something which someone has actually triggered in a
> real-world situation.  So I added a cc:stable.  Please let me know if
> that was inappropriate.
> 
> And please remember to always include all information regarding
> end-user impact when fixing bugs.
> 
This bug fix is applicable to versions starting from v4.6