[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180413083730.GA3470@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:37:31 +0100
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] sched: Introduce energy models of CPUs
On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 09:32:53 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
[...]
> And for the whole OPP discussion, perhaps we should have another
> architecture specific callback which the scheduler can call to get a
> ready-made energy model with all the structures filled in. That way
> the OPP specific stuff will move to the architecture specific
> callback.
Yes, that's another possible solution indeed. Actually, it's already on
the list of ideas to be dicussed in OSPM ;-)
Thanks,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists