[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180413110820.662d4879@ThinkPad>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:08:20 +0200
From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] kexec: Remove "weak" annotations from headers
Hi Bjorn,
in recent patches AKASHI [1] and I [2] made some changes to the declarations
you are touching and already removed some of the weak statements. The patches
got accepted on linux-next and will (hopefully) be pulled for v4.17. So you
should prepare for some merge conflicts. Nevertheless three weak statements
still remain (arch_kexec_walk_mem & arch_kexec_apply_relocations*) so your
patch still makes totally sense.
Thanks
Philipp
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/6/201
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/21/278
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:23:29 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> "Weak" annotations in header files are error-prone because they make
> every definition weak. Remove them from include/linux/kexec.h.
>
> These were introduced in two separate commits, so this is in two
> patches so they can be easily backported to stable kernels (some of
> them date back to v4.3 and one only goes back to v4.10).
>
> ---
>
> Bjorn Helgaas (2):
> kexec: Remove "weak" from kexec_file function declarations
> kexec: Remove "weak" from arch_kexec_walk_mem() declaration
>
>
> include/linux/kexec.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists