[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180413100921.GM6014@localhost>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:39:22 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dmaengine: stm32-mdma: Fix incomplete Hw
descriptors allocator
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:02 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:44:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> >
> >> struct stm32_mdma_desc {
> >> struct virt_dma_desc vdesc;
> >> u32 ccr;
> >> - struct stm32_mdma_hwdesc *hwdesc;
> >> - dma_addr_t hwdesc_phys;
> >> bool cyclic;
> >> u32 count;
> >> + struct stm32_mdma_desc_node node[];
> >
> > some ppl use node[0] for this but i think either is fine..
>
> node[] is the correct one, node[0] may hide future bugs, cfr. commit
> a158531f3c92467d ("gpio: 74x164: Fix crash during .remove()")
Yeah but it this case it is the last element. But yes it helps to avoid such
mistakes in future..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists