[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef082ed6-1af9-a578-d9da-e0874cc4769c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:52:30 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: VMX: hyper-v: Enlightened MSR-Bitmap support
On 12/04/2018 17:25, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> @@ -5335,6 +5353,9 @@ static void __always_inline vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bit
> if (!cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
> return;
>
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_emsr_bitmap))
> + evmcs_touch_msr_bitmap();
> +
> /*
> * See Intel PRM Vol. 3, 20.6.9 (MSR-Bitmap Address). Early manuals
> * have the write-low and read-high bitmap offsets the wrong way round.
> @@ -5370,6 +5391,9 @@ static void __always_inline vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitm
> if (!cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
> return;
>
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_emsr_bitmap))
> + evmcs_touch_msr_bitmap();
I'm not sure about the "unlikely". Can you just check current_evmcs
instead (dropping the static key completely)?
The function, also, is small enough that inlining should be beneficial.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists