lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180414223121.GA7475@bistromath.localdomain>
Date:   Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:31:21 +0200
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression with 5dcd8400884c ("macsec: missing dev_put() on
 error in macsec_newlink()")

Hello Laura,

2018-04-14, 10:56:55 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Fedora got a bug report of a regression when trying to remove the
> the macsec module (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566410).
> I did a bisect and found
> 
> commit 5dcd8400884cc4a043a6d4617e042489e5d566a9
> Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Date:   Wed Mar 21 11:09:01 2018 +0300
> 
>     macsec: missing dev_put() on error in macsec_newlink()
>     We moved the dev_hold(real_dev); call earlier in the function but forgot
>     to update the error paths.
>     Fixes: 0759e552bce7 ("macsec: fix negative refcnt on parent link")
>     Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> The script I used for testing based on the reporter is attached. It
> looks like modprobe is stuck in the D state. Any idea?

I don't think that reference was actually leaked. It gets released in
macsec_free_netdev() when the device is deleted.

modprobe getting stuck is just a side-effect of the refcount going
negative on the parent device, since removing the module needs to take
the lock that is held by device deletion.

I'll send a revert tomorrow.

Thanks for the report,

-- 
Sabrina

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ