[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180414223121.GA7475@bistromath.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 00:31:21 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression with 5dcd8400884c ("macsec: missing dev_put() on
error in macsec_newlink()")
Hello Laura,
2018-04-14, 10:56:55 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora got a bug report of a regression when trying to remove the
> the macsec module (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566410).
> I did a bisect and found
>
> commit 5dcd8400884cc4a043a6d4617e042489e5d566a9
> Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Date: Wed Mar 21 11:09:01 2018 +0300
>
> macsec: missing dev_put() on error in macsec_newlink()
> We moved the dev_hold(real_dev); call earlier in the function but forgot
> to update the error paths.
> Fixes: 0759e552bce7 ("macsec: fix negative refcnt on parent link")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> The script I used for testing based on the reporter is attached. It
> looks like modprobe is stuck in the D state. Any idea?
I don't think that reference was actually leaked. It gets released in
macsec_free_netdev() when the device is deleted.
modprobe getting stuck is just a side-effect of the refcount going
negative on the parent device, since removing the module needs to take
the lock that is held by device deletion.
I'll send a revert tomorrow.
Thanks for the report,
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists