linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: Ratelimit messages printed by console drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:35:16 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Ratelimit messages printed by console drivers

On (04/13/18 10:12), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > The interval is set to one hour. It is rather arbitrary selected time.
> > It is supposed to be a compromise between never print these messages,
> > do not lockup the machine, do not fill the entire buffer too quickly,
> > and get information if something changes over time.
> 
> 
> I think an hour is incredibly long. We only allow 100 lines per hour for
> printks happening inside another printk?
> 
> I think 5 minutes (at most) would probably be plenty. One minute may be
> good enough.

Besides 100 lines is absolutely not enough for any real lockdep splat.
My call would be - up to 1000 lines in a 1 minute interval.

	-ss