[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180414011029.GA18392@ssaleem-MOBL4.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:10:29 -0500
From: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: faisal.latif@...el.com, dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with
GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it
> calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for allocation.
> GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL,
> which can sleep and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists