lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180414011029.GA18392@ssaleem-MOBL4.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:10:29 -0500 From: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com> To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com> Cc: faisal.latif@...el.com, dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: i40iw: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in i40iw_add_mqh_4 On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:32:25PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > i40iw_add_mqh_4() is never called in atomic context, because it > calls rtnl_lock() that can sleep. > > Despite never getting called from atomic context, > i40iw_add_mqh_4() calls kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC, > which does not sleep for allocation. > GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL, > which can sleep and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation. > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > And I also manually check it. > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com> > --- Acked-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists