[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKE3DA84XT8TqLHthGQ1wc8vUwNDsCz0AWfyCLwg8cg=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 09:04:44 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/30] stack-protector: test compiler capability in
Kconfig and drop AUTO mode
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> In my Makefile ...
>
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE) := -fno-stack-protector
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := -fstack-protector
> stackp-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG) := -fstack-protector-strong
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-flags-y)
>
> the last one is picked.
Ah! Yes, sorry for the noise. I see the := instead of += now. Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists