lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180415201755.62a73e7d@archlinux> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:17:55 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, nfarnesi4@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: sca3000: Fix an error handling path in 'sca3000_probe()' On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 21:44:01 +0200 Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote: > Use 'devm_iio_kfifo_allocate()' instead of 'iio_kfifo_allocate()' in order > to simplify code and avoid a memory leak in an error path in > 'sca3000_probe()'. A call to 'sca3000_unconfigure_ring()' was missing. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it. I thought about queueing this up as a fix, but as it is unlikely to be hit and there is another patch (which isn't a fix) dependent on it I went with the worst of both worlds and took it for the next merge window whilst marking it for stable. I added a note to the description to say why for when people see it next cycle Thanks, Jonathan > --- > v2: Use a devm_ function to fix the leak reported in v1. > This makes 'sca3000_unconfigure_ring()' useless and simplify code. > --- > drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > index f33dadf7b262..562f125235db 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static int sca3000_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > { > struct iio_buffer *buffer; > > - buffer = iio_kfifo_allocate(); > + buffer = devm_iio_kfifo_allocate(&indio_dev->dev); > if (!buffer) > return -ENOMEM; > > @@ -1287,11 +1287,6 @@ static int sca3000_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > return 0; > } > > -static void sca3000_unconfigure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > -{ > - iio_kfifo_free(indio_dev->buffer); > -} > - > static inline > int __sca3000_hw_ring_state_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool state) > { > @@ -1546,8 +1541,6 @@ static int sca3000_remove(struct spi_device *spi) > if (spi->irq) > free_irq(spi->irq, indio_dev); > > - sca3000_unconfigure_ring(indio_dev); > - > return 0; > } >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists