[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08e478a1-e1ff-4547-b95b-2975bc5c5b5d@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:56:53 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] sched/rt: track rt rq utilization
On 03/16/2018 12:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
> For a 15 seconds long test on a hikey 6220 (octo core cortex A53 platfrom),
> the cpufreq statistics outputs (stats are reset just before the test) :
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/stats/total_trans
> without patchset : 1230
> with patchset : 14
>
> If we replace the cfs thread of rt-app by a sysbench cpu test, we can see
> performance improvements:
>
> - Without patchset :
> Test execution summary:
> total time: 15.0009s
> total number of events: 4903
> total time taken by event execution: 14.9972
> per-request statistics:
> min: 1.23ms
> avg: 3.06ms
> max: 13.16ms
> approx. 95 percentile: 12.73ms
>
> Threads fairness:
> events (avg/stddev): 4903.0000/0.00
> execution time (avg/stddev): 14.9972/0.00
>
> - With patchset:
> Test execution summary:
> total time: 15.0014s
> total number of events: 7694
> total time taken by event execution: 14.9979
> per-request statistics:
> min: 1.23ms
> avg: 1.95ms
> max: 10.49ms
> approx. 95 percentile: 10.39ms
>
> Threads fairness:
> events (avg/stddev): 7694.0000/0.00
> execution time (avg/stddev): 14.9979/0.00
>
> The performance improvement is 56% for this use case.
How do you get this number? Normally we use the 'total time' value.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists