[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180415005056.GX30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 01:51:07 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/dcache.c: re-add cond_resched() in
shrink_dcache_parent()
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 02:47:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > That breaks d_invalidate(), unfortunately. Look at the termination
> > conditions in the loop there...
>
> Ugh. I was going to say "but that doesn't even use select_collect()",
> but yeah, detach_and_collect() calls it.
>
> It would be easy enough to just change the
>
> if (!list_empty(&data.select.dispose))
>
> there to
>
> if (!list_empty(&data.select.found))
>
> too.
You would have to do the same in check_and_drop() as well,
and that brings back d_invalidate()/d_invalidate() livelock
we used to have. See 81be24d263db...
I'm trying to put something together, but the damn thing is
full of potential livelocks, unfortunately ;-/ Will send
a followup once I have something resembling a sane solution...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists