[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f70e4de-e603-147f-8c9e-5b20e0e49ec1@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:58:41 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] sched/pelt: Move pelt related code in a dedicated
file
On 03/16/2018 12:25 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.h b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c312d8c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +
> +int __update_load_avg_blocked_se(u64 now, int cpu, struct sched_entity *se);
> +int __update_load_avg_se(u64 now, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
> +int __update_load_avg_cfs_rq(u64 now, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int
> +update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
Exporting __update_load_avg_cfs_rq() for SMP and
update_cfs_rq_load_avg() for !SMP seems weird.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists