lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180415120636.GA10759@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 05:06:36 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tarick Bedeir <tarick@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB: make INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS configurable On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:06:44AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote: > Allow INFINIBAND without INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS. Why? We are pushing everyone heavily to use RDMA/CM, so making it optional seems rather counter-intuitive. You'll also have to fix tons of ULPs to explicitly depend on INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS, or make code conditional on it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists